|  |  | 
   | 
         
          |  |   
          | 
               
                |  
                    THE ABUJA II SUDANESE PEACE CONFERENCE 26 April - 17 May 1993 PRESS STATEMENT The Second Abuja Peace Conference on the 
                      Sudan was hosted by Nigeria, in Abuja, from 26th 
                      April to 17th May 1993. The Conference was between 
                      the Government of the Sudan and the Sudanese Peoples' Liberation 
                      Army (SPLM/SPLA) (mainstream) led by Dr. John Garang. The 
                      Government of the Sudan sent a high-powered delegation led 
                      by Col. Mohammed Alamin, Speaker of the Sudanese Transitional 
                      Council and includes: 1 Governor, 6 Ministers and other 
                      top ranking officials of the Sudanese Government. The (SPLM/SPLA) 
                      (mainstream) delegation was led by Commander Salva Kiir 
                      Mayardit and included 12 top ranking commanders of the (SPLM/SPLA), 
                      and a Technical Advisory team of 5 Sudanese nationals. 
                      
                       The Conference was declared open by the Vice-President 
                        of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Admiral Augustus Alkhomu 
                        on Monday, 26th April, 1993 at the International 
                        Conference Centro, Abuja. The purpose of Abuja II was 
                        to consolidate the gains of Abuja I Peace Conference which 
                        was held in this same capital from 26th May 
                        to 4th June 1992. 
                      
                       It should be recalled that at the end of that 1st 
                        Conference both parties agreed on the need:- 
                      
                       to resolve the Sudanese conflict through peaceful negotiations,
                       to work towards an institutional/political arrangement 
                        to cope with the multiple diversities of the Sudanese 
                        nation.
                       to work towards an interim arrangement aimed principally 
                        at allaying the fears of the component parts of the Sudan 
                        to enable the country (to) develop in an atmosphere of 
                        peace and security and
                       t consult with their principals in order to determine 
                        the structure and character of the Interim arrangement 
                        as well as ascertain the wishes of the people concerned. 
                      
                       For the past three weeks both sides have engaged in 
                        frank and meaningful exchanges of views on all issues 
                        that have threatened the Unity of Sudan. We have made 
                        considerable progress in our march towards a peaceful 
                        resolution of the conflict. Indeed, agreements have been 
                        reached by both parties on some areas of conflicts. Notably 
                        amongst the areas of agreement are the following:- 
                      
                        
                         A reconfirmed commitment to achieving a just and durable 
                          peace 	through negotiations.
                         A continuation of the prevailing cease-fire between 
                          the parties to allow access of relief materials tot 
                          he war-affected areas while the talks are continuing.
                         A renewed determination by both parties to continue 
                          negotiations on the sensitive issue of State and religion.
                         A commitment to the Unity of the Sudan, subject however 
                          to continued negotiations on the kind of political arrangement 
                          to be adopted for the future.
                         A proper devolution of powers between the Central 
                          and State Governments in such a way that there shall 
                          be clearly defined responsibilities and function between 
                          the Central and State governments in the Sudan. In the 
                          interim period, there should be a fairer representation 
                          of the component parts of the country in the institutional 
                          arrangement of the Central Government.
                         Establishment of a Cease-fire Commission.
                         Establishment of a National Revenue Allocation Commission 
                          (with Nigeria as an Observer member). 
                      
                       There are however, some areas of disagreement, which 
                        are central to the core issue of the conflict. Even on 
                        these areas, there is agreement that talks should continue 
                        till a meaningful and acceptable solution is found. Such 
                        areas are as follows:- a)	STATE AND RELIGION On this issue, the Government of Sudan's 
                      position is as follows: 1-	Sharia and customs shall be the 
                          two main sources of legislation in the Sudan. During 
                          the Interim period the southern states shall not be 
                          subject to any punishments based on Sharia law and alternative 
                          punishments shall be provided instead. 2-	The central government officials 
                          shall be subject to the laws of the State, which is 
                          the seat of Government. 
                      
                       Personal laws shall be governed by the religion or custom 
                        of the litigants.
                       Khartoum is both the country's capital and a state, 
                        and as such it is subject to the law prevailing in Khartoum 
                        State. The SPLM/SPLA wants Sharia only 
                              as a source of personal laws or in the alternative, 
                              the introduction of pre-1983 laws in Southern Sudan 
                              with special arrangement to cover non-northerners 
                              resident in Khartoum. b)	DEFINITION OF THE SOUTH The Government of Sudan knows "South" 
                              as the three states of Bahr El Ghazal, Equatoria 
                              and Upper Nile while SPLM/SPLA views "South" 
                              as all the war- affected areas which in addition 
                              to the 3 already mentioned also include, Nuba Mountains 
                              and Ingessena. c)	SECURITY OF THE SOUTH DURING 
                          THE INTERIM 	PERIOD The SPLM wants only the SPLA as 
                              the army in the South. The Government of Sudan fees 
                              the Sudanese army should be in a position to operate 
                              all over Sudan d)	COMPOSITION OF THE CEASE-FIRE 
                          COMMISSION The Government of Sudan wants only 
                              the Sudanese, the SPLM/A (mainstream) and the other 
                              factions as members, while Nigeria is to be the 
                              sole Observer. SPLM/SPLA wants other Observers from 
                              Kenya, Uganda, EEC and USA e)	REVENUE ALLOCATION COMMISSION Both the Sudanese Government and 
                              the SPLM/A agree on the establishment of a Revenue 
                              Allocation Commission. The Government of Sudan prefers 
                              to have a Sudanese national Chairman while SPLM/A 
                              wants a Nigerian nominee on the commission as the 
                              Chairman. The SPLM/A suggests that the Commission 
                              should have 3 member each while the government of 
                              Sudan prefers that the number to serve on the Commission 
                              should be a subject of further negotiations. f)	JUDICIARY The Government of Sudan wants a 
                              partial decentralization of Judiciary to the state 
                              but with a centralized Judicial Commission for the 
                              appointments/recruitment, transfer, discipline, 
                              promotion of Judges, etc., whereas the SPLM/A insists 
                              on Control of the machinery for the appointments, 
                              transfer, discipline, promotion of Judges etc., 
                              up to Court of Appeal level in the States, with 
                              the Supreme Court serving as Appellate Courts from 
                              the States.   g)	DEVOLUTION OF POWERS Both parties agree on the devolution 
                              of some subject matters to both state and Central 
                              Authorities but there are still some substantial 
                              areas of disagreement on some subject matter. h)	SUPREMACY RULE The Government of Sudan wants laws 
                              of the Central Authority to be supreme in case of 
                              conflict between the laws of the Central Authority 
                              and the State while SPLM/A wants State laws to be 
                              supreme. 
                      
                        
                         the two parties discussed very frankly on all these 
                          issues. It is now felt that after 3 weeks of discussions 
                          and having achieved some progress on some issues it 
                          is desirable to have a recess to allow both parties 
                          to hold further consultations with their principals 
                          with a view to obtaining fresh directives on matters 
                          that are still outstanding. Hence, our decision to adjourn 
                          he talks
                         I have tried to give you a full background 
                          of the events of the past three weeks, indicating in 
                          detail areas of agreement and areas yet to be discussed 
                          or agreed upon. We had thought our achievements was 
                          sufficient for a full communiqué to be signed 
                          by both parties. Unfortunately, we were proved wrong. 
                          A last minute hitch occurred which made it impossible 
                          for the tow parties to agree on the content of the communiqué. 	 Basically disagreement was what to 
                          do about "Residual" powers. The SPLM/A believes that after allocating 
                          powers to both central and state authorities, they believe 
                          that the residual powers automatically revert to the 
                          state. The Government of Sudan believes that the issue 
                          of "residual" powers should be held in abeyance 
                          and discussed at a later date. Despite all effort, our 
                          attempt to reconcile the two parties failed. We believe that it is better not to 
                          signs a truncated communiqué than to sign one 
                          that does not reflect the sum total of the work done 
                          in the part three weeks.   7.	The President, Government and people 
                      of Nigeria have put the disposal of our brothers in Sudan 
                      all the facilities at our disposal to assist them at arriving 
                      at an acceptable solution to the conflict. Nigeria stands 
                      ready to continue to help in an objective and unbiased manner, 
                      as long as it is the wish of both parties that we continue 
                      to do so. We remain committed to peace in the sisterly country 
                      of Sudan.8. 	I thank you all. |   
                |  |   
                |  |   
                |  |   
                |  |   
                |  |  |  |   
 |  
 | Please 
note the pdf version may take a few moments to download |  |  |  |  |  
 |  |